2012年2月13日星期一
antivirus software question
(mdf, ldf) from my antivirus 'real time protection' and scheduled sweep
scans. Actually I do this for any database files (act, quickbooks, ms
access) but I was recently thinking about this and I realized that I'm not
really sure if its necessary?
sticking with SQL server 2000/2005 since that is what this forum is for, is
it true that I should be excluding these directories (the ones with the
database and log files) from my antivirus software's protection?
and just in case someone is also familiar with the needs of any of the other
databases I mentioned, please feel free to comment on them as well. All
those other systems are flat file based database systems. I don't know if
that makes a difference with respect to antivirus software.
Each AntiVirus software scans computers differently. To generally say that
one wont affect your SQL server when anther might would be misleading.
You should test scanning folders with your particular software to see it
affects your SQL server. A decision should be made by the business owner as
to whether scanning that directory is mandated or not.
There are tons of known issues using Antivirus in a clutered envirnoment so
special attention should be givin in this situation.
here are two great articles...
"Guidelines for choosing antivirus software to run on the computers that are
running SQL Server"
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=309422
"Antivirus Software May Cause Problems with Cluster Services"
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/250355/
thanks,
/*
Warren Brunk - MCITP - SQL 2005, MCDBA
www.techintsolutions.com
*/
"djc" <noone@.nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ezYIrdB3GHA.4228@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>I currently exclude the directories that contain the sql database files
>(mdf, ldf) from my antivirus 'real time protection' and scheduled sweep
>scans. Actually I do this for any database files (act, quickbooks, ms
>access) but I was recently thinking about this and I realized that I'm not
>really sure if its necessary?
> sticking with SQL server 2000/2005 since that is what this forum is for,
> is it true that I should be excluding these directories (the ones with the
> database and log files) from my antivirus software's protection?
> and just in case someone is also familiar with the needs of any of the
> other databases I mentioned, please feel free to comment on them as well.
> All those other systems are flat file based database systems. I don't know
> if that makes a difference with respect to antivirus software.
>
|||thanks for the reply Warren. Are you refering to stability/corruption
effects or only performance effects? My main concern is if there may be
stability/corruption issues due to the antivirus, not performance. I could
gage the performance easily enough after making a change but its the
possible corruption and/or stability issues that my not be immediately
apparrent (and possibly realized to late!) that worry me. Does this change
anything? or is this still a per product issue that requires individual
testing? ...I'm always looking for that nice, simple, yet broad, rule thats
easy to remember : )
"Warren Brunk" <wbrunk@.techintsolutions.com> wrote in message
news:%23EaUchB3GHA.4312@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Each AntiVirus software scans computers differently. To generally say
> that one wont affect your SQL server when anther might would be
> misleading.
> You should test scanning folders with your particular software to see it
> affects your SQL server. A decision should be made by the business owner
> as to whether scanning that directory is mandated or not.
> There are tons of known issues using Antivirus in a clutered envirnoment
> so special attention should be givin in this situation.
> here are two great articles...
> "Guidelines for choosing antivirus software to run on the computers that
> are running SQL Server"
> http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=309422
> "Antivirus Software May Cause Problems with Cluster Services"
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/250355/
> thanks,
> --
> /*
> Warren Brunk - MCITP - SQL 2005, MCDBA
> www.techintsolutions.com
> */
>
> "djc" <noone@.nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:ezYIrdB3GHA.4228@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>
|||I am referring to both stability, performance and security. Installing
AntiVirus on a SQL server increases surface area which has security risks.
But what I am really trying to say is you need to test it with your
particular anti virus software. For me, I dont want anything actively
scanning my SQL server files for a thousand reasons. Antivirus software can
certainly create a bottleneck due to the program requiring too much CPU
time -- especially if the server is also running an e-mail server or program
that requires a lot of antivirus resources (not necessarily a best
practice). It can also create file I/O problems if real-time scanning is
enabled for all files that are opened. I definitely recommend running
malware protection on a SQL Server (or any database server for that matter),
but be sure to exclude your database directories (or specific database
files) from the real-time protection if you can. Also, keep an eye out on
processor utilization to make sure the malware protection is not eating up
all the resources.
I have seen countless forums on how AV software locks up your DB files and
put the database in Suspect Mode or causing SQL server to fail.
thanks,
/*
Warren Brunk - MCITP - SQL 2005, MCDBA
www.techintsolutions.com
*/
"djc" <noone@.nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:%23QtRDrB3GHA.4484@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> thanks for the reply Warren. Are you refering to stability/corruption
> effects or only performance effects? My main concern is if there may be
> stability/corruption issues due to the antivirus, not performance. I could
> gage the performance easily enough after making a change but its the
> possible corruption and/or stability issues that my not be immediately
> apparrent (and possibly realized to late!) that worry me. Does this change
> anything? or is this still a per product issue that requires individual
> testing? ...I'm always looking for that nice, simple, yet broad, rule
> thats easy to remember : )
> "Warren Brunk" <wbrunk@.techintsolutions.com> wrote in message
> news:%23EaUchB3GHA.4312@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>
antivirus software question
(mdf, ldf) from my antivirus 'real time protection' and scheduled sweep
scans. Actually I do this for any database files (act, quickbooks, ms
access) but I was recently thinking about this and I realized that I'm not
really sure if its necessary?
sticking with SQL server 2000/2005 since that is what this forum is for, is
it true that I should be excluding these directories (the ones with the
database and log files) from my antivirus software's protection?
and just in case someone is also familiar with the needs of any of the other
databases I mentioned, please feel free to comment on them as well. All
those other systems are flat file based database systems. I don't know if
that makes a difference with respect to antivirus software.Each AntiVirus software scans computers differently. To generally say that
one wont affect your SQL server when anther might would be misleading.
You should test scanning folders with your particular software to see it
affects your SQL server. A decision should be made by the business owner as
to whether scanning that directory is mandated or not.
There are tons of known issues using Antivirus in a clutered envirnoment so
special attention should be givin in this situation.
here are two great articles...
"Guidelines for choosing antivirus software to run on the computers that are
running SQL Server"
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=309422
"Antivirus Software May Cause Problems with Cluster Services"
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/250355/
thanks,
--
/*
Warren Brunk - MCITP - SQL 2005, MCDBA
www.techintsolutions.com
*/
"djc" <noone@.nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ezYIrdB3GHA.4228@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>I currently exclude the directories that contain the sql database files
>(mdf, ldf) from my antivirus 'real time protection' and scheduled sweep
>scans. Actually I do this for any database files (act, quickbooks, ms
>access) but I was recently thinking about this and I realized that I'm not
>really sure if its necessary?
> sticking with SQL server 2000/2005 since that is what this forum is for,
> is it true that I should be excluding these directories (the ones with the
> database and log files) from my antivirus software's protection?
> and just in case someone is also familiar with the needs of any of the
> other databases I mentioned, please feel free to comment on them as well.
> All those other systems are flat file based database systems. I don't know
> if that makes a difference with respect to antivirus software.
>|||thanks for the reply Warren. Are you refering to stability/corruption
effects or only performance effects? My main concern is if there may be
stability/corruption issues due to the antivirus, not performance. I could
gage the performance easily enough after making a change but its the
possible corruption and/or stability issues that my not be immediately
apparrent (and possibly realized to late!) that worry me. Does this change
anything? or is this still a per product issue that requires individual
testing? ...I'm always looking for that nice, simple, yet broad, rule thats
easy to remember : )
"Warren Brunk" <wbrunk@.techintsolutions.com> wrote in message
news:%23EaUchB3GHA.4312@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Each AntiVirus software scans computers differently. To generally say
> that one wont affect your SQL server when anther might would be
> misleading.
> You should test scanning folders with your particular software to see it
> affects your SQL server. A decision should be made by the business owner
> as to whether scanning that directory is mandated or not.
> There are tons of known issues using Antivirus in a clutered envirnoment
> so special attention should be givin in this situation.
> here are two great articles...
> "Guidelines for choosing antivirus software to run on the computers that
> are running SQL Server"
> http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=309422
> "Antivirus Software May Cause Problems with Cluster Services"
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/250355/
> thanks,
> --
> /*
> Warren Brunk - MCITP - SQL 2005, MCDBA
> www.techintsolutions.com
> */
>
> "djc" <noone@.nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:ezYIrdB3GHA.4228@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>I currently exclude the directories that contain the sql database files
>>(mdf, ldf) from my antivirus 'real time protection' and scheduled sweep
>>scans. Actually I do this for any database files (act, quickbooks, ms
>>access) but I was recently thinking about this and I realized that I'm not
>>really sure if its necessary?
>> sticking with SQL server 2000/2005 since that is what this forum is for,
>> is it true that I should be excluding these directories (the ones with
>> the database and log files) from my antivirus software's protection?
>> and just in case someone is also familiar with the needs of any of the
>> other databases I mentioned, please feel free to comment on them as well.
>> All those other systems are flat file based database systems. I don't
>> know if that makes a difference with respect to antivirus software.
>|||I am referring to both stability, performance and security. Installing
AntiVirus on a SQL server increases surface area which has security risks.
But what I am really trying to say is you need to test it with your
particular anti virus software. For me, I dont want anything actively
scanning my SQL server files for a thousand reasons. Antivirus software can
certainly create a bottleneck due to the program requiring too much CPU
time -- especially if the server is also running an e-mail server or program
that requires a lot of antivirus resources (not necessarily a best
practice). It can also create file I/O problems if real-time scanning is
enabled for all files that are opened. I definitely recommend running
malware protection on a SQL Server (or any database server for that matter),
but be sure to exclude your database directories (or specific database
files) from the real-time protection if you can. Also, keep an eye out on
processor utilization to make sure the malware protection is not eating up
all the resources.
I have seen countless forums on how AV software locks up your DB files and
put the database in Suspect Mode or causing SQL server to fail.
thanks,
/*
Warren Brunk - MCITP - SQL 2005, MCDBA
www.techintsolutions.com
*/
"djc" <noone@.nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:%23QtRDrB3GHA.4484@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> thanks for the reply Warren. Are you refering to stability/corruption
> effects or only performance effects? My main concern is if there may be
> stability/corruption issues due to the antivirus, not performance. I could
> gage the performance easily enough after making a change but its the
> possible corruption and/or stability issues that my not be immediately
> apparrent (and possibly realized to late!) that worry me. Does this change
> anything? or is this still a per product issue that requires individual
> testing? ...I'm always looking for that nice, simple, yet broad, rule
> thats easy to remember : )
> "Warren Brunk" <wbrunk@.techintsolutions.com> wrote in message
> news:%23EaUchB3GHA.4312@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Each AntiVirus software scans computers differently. To generally say
>> that one wont affect your SQL server when anther might would be
>> misleading.
>> You should test scanning folders with your particular software to see it
>> affects your SQL server. A decision should be made by the business owner
>> as to whether scanning that directory is mandated or not.
>> There are tons of known issues using Antivirus in a clutered envirnoment
>> so special attention should be givin in this situation.
>> here are two great articles...
>> "Guidelines for choosing antivirus software to run on the computers that
>> are running SQL Server"
>> http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=309422
>> "Antivirus Software May Cause Problems with Cluster Services"
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/250355/
>> thanks,
>> --
>> /*
>> Warren Brunk - MCITP - SQL 2005, MCDBA
>> www.techintsolutions.com
>> */
>>
>> "djc" <noone@.nowhere.com> wrote in message
>> news:ezYIrdB3GHA.4228@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>I currently exclude the directories that contain the sql database files
>>(mdf, ldf) from my antivirus 'real time protection' and scheduled sweep
>>scans. Actually I do this for any database files (act, quickbooks, ms
>>access) but I was recently thinking about this and I realized that I'm
>>not really sure if its necessary?
>> sticking with SQL server 2000/2005 since that is what this forum is for,
>> is it true that I should be excluding these directories (the ones with
>> the database and log files) from my antivirus software's protection?
>> and just in case someone is also familiar with the needs of any of the
>> other databases I mentioned, please feel free to comment on them as
>> well. All those other systems are flat file based database systems. I
>> don't know if that makes a difference with respect to antivirus
>> software.
>>
>
antivirus software question
(mdf, ldf) from my antivirus 'real time protection' and scheduled sweep
scans. Actually I do this for any database files (act, quickbooks, ms
access) but I was recently thinking about this and I realized that I'm not
really sure if its necessary?
sticking with SQL server 2000/2005 since that is what this forum is for, is
it true that I should be excluding these directories (the ones with the
database and log files) from my antivirus software's protection?
and just in case someone is also familiar with the needs of any of the other
databases I mentioned, please feel free to comment on them as well. All
those other systems are flat file based database systems. I don't know if
that makes a difference with respect to antivirus software.Each AntiVirus software scans computers differently. To generally say that
one wont affect your SQL server when anther might would be misleading.
You should test scanning folders with your particular software to see it
affects your SQL server. A decision should be made by the business owner as
to whether scanning that directory is mandated or not.
There are tons of known issues using Antivirus in a clutered envirnoment so
special attention should be givin in this situation.
here are two great articles...
"Guidelines for choosing antivirus software to run on the computers that are
running SQL Server"
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=309422
"Antivirus Software May Cause Problems with Cluster Services"
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/250355/
thanks,
--
/*
Warren Brunk - MCITP - SQL 2005, MCDBA
www.techintsolutions.com
*/
"djc" <noone@.nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ezYIrdB3GHA.4228@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>I currently exclude the directories that contain the sql database files
>(mdf, ldf) from my antivirus 'real time protection' and scheduled sweep
>scans. Actually I do this for any database files (act, quickbooks, ms
>access) but I was recently thinking about this and I realized that I'm not
>really sure if its necessary?
> sticking with SQL server 2000/2005 since that is what this forum is for,
> is it true that I should be excluding these directories (the ones with the
> database and log files) from my antivirus software's protection?
> and just in case someone is also familiar with the needs of any of the
> other databases I mentioned, please feel free to comment on them as well.
> All those other systems are flat file based database systems. I don't know
> if that makes a difference with respect to antivirus software.
>|||thanks for the reply Warren. Are you refering to stability/corruption
effects or only performance effects? My main concern is if there may be
stability/corruption issues due to the antivirus, not performance. I could
gage the performance easily enough after making a change but its the
possible corruption and/or stability issues that my not be immediately
apparrent (and possibly realized to late!) that worry me. Does this change
anything? or is this still a per product issue that requires individual
testing? ...I'm always looking for that nice, simple, yet broad, rule thats
easy to remember : )
"Warren Brunk" <wbrunk@.techintsolutions.com> wrote in message
news:%23EaUchB3GHA.4312@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Each AntiVirus software scans computers differently. To generally say
> that one wont affect your SQL server when anther might would be
> misleading.
> You should test scanning folders with your particular software to see it
> affects your SQL server. A decision should be made by the business owner
> as to whether scanning that directory is mandated or not.
> There are tons of known issues using Antivirus in a clutered envirnoment
> so special attention should be givin in this situation.
> here are two great articles...
> "Guidelines for choosing antivirus software to run on the computers that
> are running SQL Server"
> http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=309422
> "Antivirus Software May Cause Problems with Cluster Services"
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/250355/
> thanks,
> --
> /*
> Warren Brunk - MCITP - SQL 2005, MCDBA
> www.techintsolutions.com
> */
>
> "djc" <noone@.nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:ezYIrdB3GHA.4228@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>|||I am referring to both stability, performance and security. Installing
AntiVirus on a SQL server increases surface area which has security risks.
But what I am really trying to say is you need to test it with your
particular anti virus software. For me, I dont want anything actively
scanning my SQL server files for a thousand reasons. Antivirus software can
certainly create a bottleneck due to the program requiring too much CPU
time -- especially if the server is also running an e-mail server or program
that requires a lot of antivirus resources (not necessarily a best
practice). It can also create file I/O problems if real-time scanning is
enabled for all files that are opened. I definitely recommend running
malware protection on a SQL Server (or any database server for that matter),
but be sure to exclude your database directories (or specific database
files) from the real-time protection if you can. Also, keep an eye out on
processor utilization to make sure the malware protection is not eating up
all the resources.
I have seen countless forums on how AV software locks up your DB files and
put the database in Suspect Mode or causing SQL server to fail.
thanks,
/*
Warren Brunk - MCITP - SQL 2005, MCDBA
www.techintsolutions.com
*/
"djc" <noone@.nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:%23QtRDrB3GHA.4484@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> thanks for the reply Warren. Are you refering to stability/corruption
> effects or only performance effects? My main concern is if there may be
> stability/corruption issues due to the antivirus, not performance. I could
> gage the performance easily enough after making a change but its the
> possible corruption and/or stability issues that my not be immediately
> apparrent (and possibly realized to late!) that worry me. Does this change
> anything? or is this still a per product issue that requires individual
> testing? ...I'm always looking for that nice, simple, yet broad, rule
> thats easy to remember : )
> "Warren Brunk" <wbrunk@.techintsolutions.com> wrote in message
> news:%23EaUchB3GHA.4312@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>
AntiVirus Software on SQL Server?
was not a very good thing to do. My network admin is planning a Windows 2000
migration and would like all machines across the domain to run AV software.
Can anyone tell me about their experience running AV software on their
database server, and whether this is a good idea or not.
The box runs SQL 6.5sp5a (soon to be 2k) and does not touch the outside
world at all.
Thanks for your help,
CurtisAs much as you may want to keep anti-virus software away
from a SQL box, you'll soon realize that that's a lost
battle. When there is a virus crisis, whatever arguments
you may have to avoid anti-virus on your SQL box, you'll
end being defeated badly.
My experience is to simply give up on avoiding virus scan
completely, and ask for the SQL files being excluded from
the virus scan. I typically ask the security folks to
exclude the following files from being scanned: *.MDF,
*.LDF, *.NDF, *.BAK, *.TRN, and *.BKP.
The primary reason you don't want anti-virus scanning is
that the virus scan software may get hold of a SQL
data/log file and prevents SQL Server from opening it,
resulting in the database being put into the suspect mode.
Usually, these data/log files are open all the time, and
therefore not an issue. But sometimes we may need to shut
down SQL Server instance or detach a database. Before we
restart SQL Server or attach the database, if the virus
software gets ahead of us, we are screwed.
There are also some issues with SQL Server running in a
cluster.
Check out: Q309422 and Q250355
Linchi
>--Original Message--
>As a DBA, I was taught that running Anti-virus software
on a database server
>was not a very good thing to do. My network admin is
planning a Windows 2000
>migration and would like all machines across the domain
to run AV software.
>Can anyone tell me about their experience running AV
software on their
>database server, and whether this is a good idea or not.
>The box runs SQL 6.5sp5a (soon to be 2k) and does not
touch the outside
>world at all.
>Thanks for your help,
>Curtis
>
>.
>
Antivirus software on SQL Server 2000
INF: Consideration for a Virus Scanner on a Computer That Is Running SQL
Server
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;309422&Product=sql2k
Geoff N. Hiten
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Senior Database Administrator
Careerbuilder.com
"Lane Lesperance" <LLesperance@.cooperpower.com> wrote in message
news:ekCZHsCwDHA.1764@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> I am preparing to install SQL Server 2000 on a Windows 2003 server. There
will be no file or print sharing services or in general no other processes
running on this server except those required by SQL Server. The SQL Server
is behind a filewall and will only be accessed internally. Should I install
McAfee or Norton antivirus software on this machine? If so, are there any
special configuration options that I should consider?
>|||See http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;309422
In general, it is not recommended to do so if you don't
have to on a SQL box due to the things you mention (i.e.
not a file server, etc.). If you do, filter the SQL
DB/log files (not the executables), and if it's a cluster,
filter the \MSCS and if it exists, \MSDtc folders on the
quorum.
>--Original Message--
>I am preparing to install SQL Server 2000 on a Windows
2003 server. There will be no file or print sharing
services or in general no other processes running on this
server except those required by SQL Server. The SQL Server
is behind a filewall and will only be accessed internally.
Should I install McAfee or Norton antivirus software on
this machine? If so, are there any special configuration
options that I should consider?
>
>.
>
AntiVirus Software for SQL Cluster Servers
software I should use. Any information will be greatly appreciated.
I like TrendMicro, whatever you get - exclude the MSCS and data directories,
if not the entire shared disks at a minimum.
Cheers,
Rodney R. Fournier
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering Website
http://www.msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
http://www.clusterhelp.com - Cluster Training
ClusterHelp.com is a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner
"Yuhong" <Yuhong@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:3201F19C-E8CF-4BF1-AEEF-A5BAEB8D80F1@.microsoft.com...
> Hi, I am setting up a 2 nodes sql cluster and not sure what AntiVirus
> software I should use. Any information will be greatly appreciated.
>
|||I have never used TrendMicro. Should I order a specific version? will it be
aware of the cluster?
Thanks for your help!
Yuhong
"Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]" wrote:
> I like TrendMicro, whatever you get - exclude the MSCS and data directories,
> if not the entire shared disks at a minimum.
> Cheers,
> Rodney R. Fournier
> MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
> http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering Website
> http://www.msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
> http://www.clusterhelp.com - Cluster Training
> ClusterHelp.com is a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner
>
> "Yuhong" <Yuhong@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:3201F19C-E8CF-4BF1-AEEF-A5BAEB8D80F1@.microsoft.com...
>
>
|||The latest OfficeScan is cluster aware. Don't let the silly name fool you,
it work for both workstations and servers.
Cheers,
Rodney R. Fournier
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering Website
http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
http://www.clusterhelp.com - Cluster Training
ClusterHelp.com is a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner
"Yuhong" <Yuhong@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:E2E02DA9-F7B3-48C4-9846-7B0835B4A09D@.microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
>I have never used TrendMicro. Should I order a specific version? will it be
> aware of the cluster?
> Thanks for your help!
> Yuhong
> "Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]" wrote:
|||Great. Thanks so much for your information!
Yuhong
"Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]" wrote:
> The latest OfficeScan is cluster aware. Don't let the silly name fool you,
> it work for both workstations and servers.
> Cheers,
> Rodney R. Fournier
> MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
> http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering Website
> http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
> http://www.clusterhelp.com - Cluster Training
> ClusterHelp.com is a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner
>
> "Yuhong" <Yuhong@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:E2E02DA9-F7B3-48C4-9846-7B0835B4A09D@.microsoft.com...
>
>
|||We use McAfee VirusScan on our clusters. It seems to be working fine. As
Rodney mentioned, do exclude the SQL Server files from scan.
Linchi
"Yuhong" wrote:
> Hi, I am setting up a 2 nodes sql cluster and not sure what AntiVirus
> software I should use. Any information will be greatly appreciated.
>
|||Thanks, Linchi! I will look into these products.
"Linchi Shea" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> We use McAfee VirusScan on our clusters. It seems to be working fine. As
> Rodney mentioned, do exclude the SQL Server files from scan.
> Linchi
> "Yuhong" wrote:
|||In addition, exclude any backup file locations from virus scan, either on
the local box or on a network share. You don't want to see what happens to
a SQL server if an AV program detects a virus in the backup data stream. It
isn't pretty.
Geoff N. Hiten
Senior Database Administrator
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"Yuhong" <Yuhong@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:3201F19C-E8CF-4BF1-AEEF-A5BAEB8D80F1@.microsoft.com...
> Hi, I am setting up a 2 nodes sql cluster and not sure what AntiVirus
> software I should use. Any information will be greatly appreciated.
>
|||OK. Thanks!
Do I need to exclude the MSDTC cluster resource drive from the scan also?
"Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:
> In addition, exclude any backup file locations from virus scan, either on
> the local box or on a network share. You don't want to see what happens to
> a SQL server if an AV program detects a virus in the backup data stream. It
> isn't pretty.
> --
> Geoff N. Hiten
> Senior Database Administrator
> Microsoft SQL Server MVP
>
>
> "Yuhong" <Yuhong@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:3201F19C-E8CF-4BF1-AEEF-A5BAEB8D80F1@.microsoft.com...
>
|||I would!
Cheers,
Rodney R. Fournier
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering Website
http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
http://www.clusterhelp.com - Cluster Training
ClusterHelp.com is a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner
"Yuhong" <Yuhong@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:2CA26428-B8A6-47FB-8DEC-F031CB34F449@.microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> OK. Thanks!
> Do I need to exclude the MSDTC cluster resource drive from the scan also?
>
> "Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:
AntiVirus Software
configure the system not to scan *.bak, *.mdf, *.ldf. My question:
1. Is this the right configuration ?
2. By doing so, any potential security breach ?
3. By doing so, will the SQL box performance improve a bit?
Furthermore, we will have a new clustered SQL insatlled later on in our data
center, any recommendation on antiVirus configuration on SAN ?
Much appreciated.Hi
By not allowing the file extensions to be scanned will mean any file in any
directory will be able to have this extension, you may want to look at
excluding by directory, which if would leave less possibilities for a rogue
file if your permissions are tight enough, a combination of both would be
even tighter!!.
You may want to run MBSA to see if it recomends anything to be improved.
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...kb;en-us;309422 also
recommends .ndf files but database files can have any extension name so make
sure that any database file extension is included in an exclude list. The
article also gives recommendations for SAN discs.
Make sure that your database do not have the autoclose property set.
If you have full text searching then you should look at not scanning
"C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL\FTData"
A-V software can cause problems such as
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...kb;en-us;170338
The performance effect of the a-v software will depend to some extent on the
hardware you are running, make sure that when it is running it is not too
resource hungry and your disc have not become a bottleneck.
John
"Lan" <Lan@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:AAF5085D-DF64-4E0E-A4F2-7C34D0AC468F@.microsoft.com...
> We have McAfee VirusScan installed on our database server. I would like to
> configure the system not to scan *.bak, *.mdf, *.ldf. My question:
> 1. Is this the right configuration ?
> 2. By doing so, any potential security breach ?
> 3. By doing so, will the SQL box performance improve a bit?
> Furthermore, we will have a new clustered SQL insatlled later on in our
> data
> center, any recommendation on antiVirus configuration on SAN ?
> Much appreciated.|||Most anti-virus products will allow you to bypass the scanning of specific
directories.You can selectively disallow the scanning of the data file and
transaction log directories.
Hilary Cotter
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"Lan" <Lan@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:AAF5085D-DF64-4E0E-A4F2-7C34D0AC468F@.microsoft.com...
> We have McAfee VirusScan installed on our database server. I would like to
> configure the system not to scan *.bak, *.mdf, *.ldf. My question:
> 1. Is this the right configuration ?
> 2. By doing so, any potential security breach ?
> 3. By doing so, will the SQL box performance improve a bit?
> Furthermore, we will have a new clustered SQL insatlled later on in our
> data
> center, any recommendation on antiVirus configuration on SAN ?
> Much appreciated.|||I don't know what type of virus McAfee would be looking for in a mdf or ldf
file. If it scans the entire GB sized files from top to bottom while
referncing every possible virus signature pattern, it would result in a lot
of wasted I/O, CPU cycles, and possibly locking issues.
First make sure you have installed the version specifically designed to run
on a server. Also, it may only be prudent to have it scan only those file
types typically infected by viruses.
"Lan" <Lan@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:AAF5085D-DF64-4E0E-A4F2-7C34D0AC468F@.microsoft.com...
> We have McAfee VirusScan installed on our database server. I would like to
> configure the system not to scan *.bak, *.mdf, *.ldf. My question:
> 1. Is this the right configuration ?
> 2. By doing so, any potential security breach ?
> 3. By doing so, will the SQL box performance improve a bit?
> Furthermore, we will have a new clustered SQL insatlled later on in our
> data
> center, any recommendation on antiVirus configuration on SAN ?
> Much appreciated.|||On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 01:57:02 -0800, Lan <Lan@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrot
e:
in <AAF5085D-DF64-4E0E-A4F2-7C34D0AC468F@.microsoft.com>
>We have McAfee VirusScan installed on our database server. I would like to
>configure the system not to scan *.bak, *.mdf, *.ldf. My question:
>1. Is this the right configuration ?
>2. By doing so, any potential security breach ?
>3. By doing so, will the SQL box performance improve a bit?
>Furthermore, we will have a new clustered SQL insatlled later on in our dat
a
>center, any recommendation on antiVirus configuration on SAN ?
>Much appreciated.
I've found McAfee to be about the worst choice for anti virus, especially on
a
server. It's bloated, heavy handed, and almost amateurish in its ability to
discriminate between what constitutes a threat and what doesn't.
For ease of use, small footprint, and utter effectiveness have a look at AVG
.
Although I'm disheartened by the fact that they've been acquired by microsof
t,
it's been almost a year now and I haven't seen any overtly negative changes
yet.
Stefan Berglund
2012年2月11日星期六
anti-virus on sql server box?
i am using sql 2005 with sp1 standard edition.
i have a question regarding the antivirus software. Is it ok to install anti-virus software on the sql server box? what are the issues involved if we install anti-virus software on the sql server box?
I heard, it causes some performance and other issues.
Is there anything we need to take care of .if we decide to install anti-virus software on the sql server box?
Can anybody share experience on this?
Thanks
Personally, I am very much against installing anti-virus software on a SQL Server box, for performance reasons. You see conflicting advice from Microsoft about this. The Perf people say no, and the security people say yes. If you decide to run AV on your SQL Server, make sure to exclude the data and log files from the scanning.|||
Generally speaking, it is not a good idea to have anti-virus products on a SQL Server.
Consider that anti-virus products protect the computer from user activities in the Workstation service.
On a SQL Server, there 'should' not be any user activities in the Workstation service.
|||I disagree with the other posts here.ALWAYS run anti-virus on ALL machines on the network, servers and pcs, with current virus defs.
On SQL server, exclude the data and log directories from the scanning and virus protection.
Many viruses will infect all machines on the entire network, and if you don't have AV on ALL machines, when you remove it from all your PCs, it will hide on your SQL server box until it infects the entire network again and again and again. I know because this has happened to me, with more than one customer who has the same "performance" concerns.
|||Yes, I agree with Tlom. There are several approaches, defined by the policy of the companies which way you can take if you secure SQL Server. You can either exclude the data file and directories or exclude the appropuiate MDF / LDF extensions (which assumes that you are using these extensions with your files) I prefer the extensions exclusion which will makes it even not possible to inject a virus in the data directories of SQL Server.
Jens K. Suessmeyer.
http://www.sqlserver2005.de
|||Thank you everyone for your replies. I really appreciate it.So if you exclude the data and log files, are there any performance issues and other issues like communication/blocking etc ?
Thanks
|||
I hope this will help you:
Guidelines for choosing antivirus software to run on the computers that are running SQL Server
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/309422/en-usAntivirus on a 2003 Cluster
I am trying to work out if it is ok to install an antivirus product onto my
Windows 2003 SQL Cluster.
According to Symantec I can:
http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT... er=savce_9.0
but Microsoft don't seem too keen on the idea:
http://support.microsoft.com/default...;EN-US;Q250355
Has anyone managed to install antivirus onto a cluster with no problems or
is it best just to leave my servers as they are?
Thanks
Kristi
You can install, just exclude the MSCS directory and where you put your SQL
Data.
Cheers,
Rod
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering Website
http://www.msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
"Krissi" <krissi@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:42636498$1@.quokka.wn.com.au...
> Hi all
> I am trying to work out if it is ok to install an antivirus product onto
> my
> Windows 2003 SQL Cluster.
> According to Symantec I can:
> http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT... er=savce_9.0
> but Microsoft don't seem too keen on the idea:
> http://support.microsoft.com/default...;EN-US;Q250355
> Has anyone managed to install antivirus onto a cluster with no problems or
> is it best just to leave my servers as they are?
> Thanks
> Kristi
>
|||Trend Micro with Server Protect have a good solution.
"Krissi" wrote:
> Hi all
> I am trying to work out if it is ok to install an antivirus product onto my
> Windows 2003 SQL Cluster.
> According to Symantec I can:
> http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT... er=savce_9.0
> but Microsoft don't seem too keen on the idea:
> http://support.microsoft.com/default...;EN-US;Q250355
> Has anyone managed to install antivirus onto a cluster with no problems or
> is it best just to leave my servers as they are?
> Thanks
> Kristi
>
>
|||Agreed, that is what I recommend and use, but you still need to exclude
directories
Cheers,
Rod
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering Website
http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
"LUCA MOTTERLE [MCP]" <LUCAMOTTERLEMCP@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:E2242F94-D213-430C-85C4-DF8712B455D3@.microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Trend Micro with Server Protect have a good solution.
> "Krissi" wrote:
Antivirus experiences
issues in the past but antiviruses had changed a lot and maybe you have
good/bad experiences to share that I can apply to a clustered
SQL2000sp3/w2003 install i'm doing now. Hopefully you can include AV brand
and versions wich are definetly very important.
We use Trend ServerProtect 5.58 on the nodes, we exclude the MSCS, MSDTC,
SQLData, and SQLLog directories.
Cheers,
Rod
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering
http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
"Christian Castro" <Christian Castro@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:8DD62C7A-73FD-4F3D-AFA2-167C2FE2F651@.microsoft.com...
>I would like to know the group's experiences on that topic. I had several
> issues in the past but antiviruses had changed a lot and maybe you have
> good/bad experiences to share that I can apply to a clustered
> SQL2000sp3/w2003 install i'm doing now. Hopefully you can include AV brand
> and versions wich are definetly very important.
Antivirus
software on sql servers. Which files to exclude, what
can happen by scanning all files, etc.You'd want to exclude your data and log files. Additionally,
the following article has some guidelines:
INF: Consideration for a Virus Scanner on a Computer That Is
Running SQL Server
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=309422
-Sue
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:55:42 -0800, "Thad Molling"
<anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>I'm looking for a best practice for running antivirus
>software on sql servers. Which files to exclude, what
>can happen by scanning all files, etc.|||Add don't run it at all on a cluster. Anti-virus can interfere with the
ability of the cluster service to shift disk resources from node to node.
Geoff N. Hiten
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Senior Database Administrator
Careerbuilder.com
I support the Professional Association for SQL Server
www.sqlpass.org
"Sue Hoegemeier" <Sue_H@.nomail.please> wrote in message
news:r9ak50tjjrgb0alt9qa2ali45bk2ame7ia@.
4ax.com...
> You'd want to exclude your data and log files. Additionally,
> the following article has some guidelines:
> INF: Consideration for a Virus Scanner on a Computer That Is
> Running SQL Server
> http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=309422
> -Sue
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:55:42 -0800, "Thad Molling"
> <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>